They're coming into the marketplace hungry for direction, but they don't want some person who claims to have all the answers. I started out thinking that BLEEP 2 would be a ground-breaking update covering ideas and discoveries in quantum physics, brain neurology and consciousness studies introduced over a decade ago. That would be, very hard to quantify:). In one experiment, people who were walking across a college campus were asked by a stranger for directions. We want to bridge divides to reach everyone. So when you hear about quantum mechanics and devices, you can say, "OK, that sounds reasonable." suggest that science allows you to capitalize on quantum possibilities, but theoretical physicist Lawrence Krauss says it's just a load of bleep. On August 1, 2006 What the Bleep! The debate here is that we'll be able to use quantum mechanics to break codes, in particular to determine the big prime numbers that are at the basis of the security of your credit cards and your bank cards. Dr Joe Dispenza and Miceal Ledwith are both long time students and appointed teachers at Ramthas school of enlightenment (RSE). It's actually the machine that's the observer, not the human who's jotting down results. The point is, with quantum mechanics, everything doesn't go. Check my single page unpublishable http://dftuz.unizar.es/~rivero/research/simple.pdf. The movie "What the Bleep do we know" How much is true, or just entertainment. Suddenly people who were talking about subatomic particles are alluding to alternate universes and cosmic forces, all of which can be harnessed in the interest of making Ms. Matlin's character feel better about her thighs. Blech. up and at each step we're eliminating information and finally what is bubbling up to consciousness is the one that is most self-serving. "But that's two leaps beyond what scientists believe to be true.". The following persons in the film have all spoken at RSE and sold books there. John Hagelin, PhD, describes a study he did in Washington in 1992. Bleep was conceived and its production funded by William Arntz, who co-directed the film along with Betsy Chasse and Mark Vicente; all three were students of Ramtha's School of Enlightenment. "[15], Bernie Hobbs, a science writer with ABC Science Online, explains why the film is incorrect about quantum physics and reality: "The observer effect of quantum physics isn't about people or reality. Our work isn't possible without your support. It demands a freedom of view and greatness of thought so far unknown, indeed, not even dreamed of since Copernicus. Since its release in April 2004, this independent film has become a cult hit, playing to packed houses and grossing over $7.5 . But it's quite a leap to say the brain doesn't know the difference between vision and memory. Q: You do see that in some science . Intercut with these metaphysical ponderings is a soapy fictional narrative starring Marlee Matlin as a broken-hearted photographer. What the #$*! " " what the bleep do we know ( 2 ) Full HD 2 . Lawrence Krauss: I think it's probably one of the most abused concepts in physics among the public. "What The Bleep Do We Know? Not exactly, Amit. But the movie gradually moves to quantum 'insights' that lead a woman to toss away her antidepressant medication, to the quantum channeling of Ramtha, the 35,000-year-old Lemurian warrior, and on to even greater nonsense." "I create my own reality, says quantum physics," intones one expert, and the viewer could be lured to accept this as proof. "Physical reality is absolutely rock solid, yet it only comes into existence when it bumps up against another piece of physical reality like us, or a rock." Amanda is a divorced woman who makes a living as a photographer. 1. Supported by groups like the Templeton Foundation, legitimateor more creative scientists are exploring the mind-body connection, or the similarities between particle-and-wave physics and certain religious concepts like the Trinity. That matter is not solid, and electrons are able to pop in and out of existence without it being known where they disappear to. It's more like a collision in the editing room between talking heads, an impenetrable human parable and a hallucinogenic animated cartoon. According to Joo Magueijo, professor in theoretical physics at Imperial College, the film deliberately misquotes science. Even so it notched up $10m in. What the Bleep Do We Know was directed and produced by Betsy Chasse, Mark Vicente and William Arntz, all of whom were students of Ramtha's School of Enlightenment. The question is, how far down the rabbit hole, do you wanna go? Hobbs further disputed the film's use of the ten percent of the brain myth. It went on to say that "Most laypeople cannot tell where the quantum physics ends and the quantum nonsense begins, and many are susceptible to being misguided," and that "a physics student may be unable to convincingly confront unjustified extrapolations of quantum mechanics," a shortcoming which the authors attribute to the current teaching of quantum mechanics, in which "we tacitly deny the mysteries physics has encountered". It was an interesting idea aiming to solve the hierachy problem, as announced. Update: More information at the end of the video description.Comment approval now removed. Dr. Jeffrey Satinover (psychiatrist, PhD candidate in physics), in What the Bleep Do We Know? But we're certainly using them at the Large Hadron Collider, which we couldn't even operate if we didn't have superconducting magnets. Bleep raises thought-provoking questions about science and its relationship to spirituality and metaphysics. Krauss worries that a lot of people can be fooled by appeals to the admittedly weird world of quantum physics a world in which particles are said to take every possible path from point A to point B, in which the position and velocity of particles are necessarily cloaked in uncertainty, in which the mere act of observation changes the thing being observed. Use this form to email 'What the bleep are they on about?' A classic experiment on visual processing involves asking people to watch a video of 6 people passing a basketball, and press a button every time a particular team has possession. Prominent if you go by citations that is. Even though there's lots of proof that the Moon landing happened, some people don't . Pingback: Not Even Wrong Blog Archive Hidden Dimensions, Pingback: Rachels Musings Rabbit Holes and Other Oddities, Pingback: Not Even Wrong Blog Archive Philosophy of Science on Blogginheads.tv, Pingback: For "The Baby Goes Out With The Bathwater" Crowd - SLUniverse Forums. Present thinking on neurology and addiction are covered in some detail but,. But that doesn't mean that astrology is true. . 3. The 2004 theatrical release was succeeded by a substantially changed, extended home media version in 2006. Scientists in the physical realm also hypothesize that matter is solid (Wilson 5). There are lots of things in quantum mechanics that sound like magic. This is one reason physicists studying a subatomic particle create large numbers of them in particle accelerators. It was clearly time to check the facts for myself. last of a series of columns written for Scientific American, Why great minds can't grasp consciousness. The question "What the bleep do we know?" has an unambiguous answer: both surprisingly much and amazingly little. ISHEAGU MASSACRE HISTORICAL BACKGROUND: Isheagu is a town whose origin is traceable to the Eastern part of the contraption called Nigeria. But no scientific discovery has proved so ripe for spiritual projection as the theories of quantum physics, replete with their quixotic qualities of uncertainty, simultaneity and parallelism." Hagelin might be crazy, but some of those papers are co-written by John Ellis and other respectable people. "The theory can't predict with precision what will happen, but it knows everything that can happen and it will tell you the probability of all these things happening.". I had it recommended to me by no less than three people. Evidently Albert claims he was taken advantage of, that his interview was heavily edited to misrepresent his views. improve functionality and performance. Pingback: yeago works Blog Archive Jesus, Buddha, Ken Wilber?? If it's true, no one's been able to measure it or see the effects. Im not personally familiar with any of Hagelins work but Im sure theres some good physics in there. The movie contains interviews from such leaders in their fields as: Candace. "I think the point is that Feynman realized that people can be fooled, but nature can't.". It is just a movie. Even skeptics concede that we humans can fall into destructive thought patterns and need to cleanse our vision of what's real. There appears to be no evidence to support this claim. We asked some of Britain's best scientific brains to give us their verdicts, Original reporting and incisive analysis, direct from the Guardian every morning. Regular indicators of violent crime told a different story the number of murders actually went up. Right now they use a key that's based on the products of large prime numbers, and no computer could determine the prime factors in a time shorter than the age of the universe. It presents itself as the thinking rebel's alternative to Hollywood pabulum: a heady stew of drama and documentary, starring Oscar-winning actress Marlee Matlin as a Xanax-addled photographer who. Z. Knight and her pet dead guy Ramtha. The Christian Science Monitor has expired. What the Bleep Do We Know? After a successful DVD launch in March of 2005, Fox . And you'd do the study without knowing what had been 'said' to the water specimens, so your subjective opinions wouldn't colour the results. ?, with over 15 hours of material on three double-sided DVDs. Filename F:\torrent\What the Bleep Do We Know_2CD\disc one\09 What the Bleep.wav Peak level 100.0 % Extraction speed 8.6 X Track quality 100.0 % Test CRC 2A67087E Copy CRC 2A67087E Accurately ripped (confidence 4) [55AC2A89] (AR v1) Copy OK Track 10 Filename F:\torrent\What the Bleep Do We Know_2CD\disc one\10 Circle the Sun.wav Peak level 100.0 % was heavily criticised for being "a documentary aimed at the totally gullible". Fred Allen Wolf "What the Bleep" begins in NOVA-like fashion: galaxies swirl and scientists--we aren't told who they are until the end--expound on quantum mechanics and the nature of the universe. The observer can't be ignored." "What the Bleep Do We Know," as it is referred to for convenience, is not a conventional documentary about quantum physics. does a reasonable job of presenting some of these quandaries, researchers say. She's averse to churches (she married her husband in one, so they must be bad! (Source: iStockphoto). If it were manifest, you could run at a wall a lot of times, and every now and then you'd spontaneously appear on the other side of the wall. Beliefnet is a lifestyle website providing feature editorial content around the topics of inspiration, spirituality, health, wellness, love and family, news and entertainment. Not everything is possible. Joe Dispenza Early in the film, she is trying to take portraits at the train station, but nobody seems to be buying. (stylized as What t #$*! Dr Emoto takes photos of crystals formed in freezing water. is a book of amazing science, and now the international bestselling book is available in paperback. Miceal Ledwith Interspersed with the plot were interviews with various supposed scientists with something to say about quantum physics, consciousness, God, etc. During our current Covid19 pandemic, this collection is highly relevant to a world still seeking novel answers to the human condition and also drawn to old theories long ago debunked. Wertheim continues that the film "abandons itself entirely to the ecstasies of quantum mysticism, finding in this aleatory description of nature the key to spiritual transformation. Q: Why do you think that people have seized upon this?

Blueface Restaurant Soul Food, Rosenberg Family Net Worth, Vontae Mack No Matter What Shirt, Ct Fishing License Reciprocity, Articles W